The Politics Of Racism?

OAK BLUFFS, MA - AUGUST 11: (AFP OUT) U.S. President Barack Obama reacts as he golfs on the first hole on Farm Neck Golf Club on the first day of his vacation August 11, 2013 in Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts. His foursome included aide Marvin Nicholson, White House chef Sam Kass and Robert Wolf, a Wall Street consultant. The First Family is on vacation in Martha's Vineyard from August 10-18th. (Photo by Vincent DeWitt-Pool/Getty Images)
Obama golfing 8/16/16

Remember when hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans back in 2005? The liar czar media establishment and the socialist-democrats blamed it on George W. Bush before, during and after the storm hit. That’s all you saw on your television sets non-stop, day and night. That being said, George W. Bush visited the area several times to survey the damage and direct government agencies to help the people that needed it the most. At least he made an honorable effort to address the problem.

Today, well we have a whole different story. In the aftermath of the deadly flooding in Louisiana, there seems to be no accountability on our first biracial president. Seemingly, Obama has no responsibilities whatsoever regarding the people of Louisiana. Apparently the only responsibility Obama has is to continue working on his golf game at his luxurious vacation spot in Martha’s Vineyard. Obama doesn’t get the same outrage from the national press like George W. Bush received. Could it be because Bush was a white republican? The democrat party today is the anti-white party. Just ask the person who gladly huddles around the racist Black Lives Matter group at the White House. That guy happens to be a hypocritical righteous fool.

The only person addressing the problem facing Americans living in the southeast today isn’t Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary Clinton, it’s Donald Trump. He is the only person who is leading any effort to address the problems facing Americans down in Louisiana. He isn’t taking the day off vacationing like Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama. Those two only pretend to fix problems when it comes to people who vote the party line. For the people suffering from the disastrous flooding in Louisiana, the real reason that Obama and Hillary don’t give a damn about their plight is simple.  Their problem doesn’t revolve around the politics of racism. If it did. Obama and Hillary would have been down there A.S.A.P. But it doesn’t. So why bother?

Bush Derangement Syndrome 2016?

imageIt is very peculiar to discover that an extremist, ultra-left wing publication that practically invented the incurable and debilitating sickness known as Bush Derangement Syndrome in 2001, is now awkwardly coming to the defense of a Bush in 2015. Bush Derangement Syndrome was first discovered in 2001. It afflicted every leftist within the country from 2001 to 2008. The symptoms of this syndrome were on display whenever anything and everything that could possibly go wrong in this country made American leftists feel ginned up anger and irrational rage and resentment toward president George W. Bush. If there was a hurricane, murder, low gas prices, terrorism, oil spills and heavens to bid even if your soup wasn’t hot enough the Liar Czar Media made sure to pin the blame on George W. Bush. It was used constantly by the press day and night, 24-7 to demonize and destroy the credibility of the sitting president.  So it is rather surprising to see the an extremist, ultra-left wing publication come to the defense of his brother’s faltering 2016 presidential campaign.

According to New York Magazine’s own headline, Donald Trump or anyone else who even dares to believe in the altruistic idea of following the rule of law in this country you are, “insanely racist!” This irrational analogy was on display after Donald Trump ran a 15 second ad on his Instagram account depicting the truth about Jeb Bush’s stance on illegal immigration.

Jeb Bush’s stance on illegal immigration is to continue the open border policy that allows illegals to enter our country even as more Americans are documented as being raped, robbed and murdered by them on a daily basis. The reason the radical’s at New York Magazine rushed to the defense of Jeb Bush’s immigration position is because it is identical to Hillary Clinton’s. They both are for open borders. Recent polling indicates the American people’s views on immigration are more aligned with Donald Trump’s views than with either Jeb Bush’s or Hillary Clinton’s. As long as the borders continue to stay completely wide open, more aliens will be allowed to illegally enter the country to inflict not love, but pain and misery on loved ones who belong to families of law abiding Americans.  Crime rates aren’t the only statistic that rises when illegal aliens cross our border. Studies have proven that more than half become dependent on our welfare state.

The Liar Czar Media is in cahoots with the socialist party in trying to knock out Trump’s presidential chances in order to save Hillary’s.  Their hoping on Hillary having a liberal republican to run against her so she can artfully move to the middle by co opting her opponent’s agenda. You can be be rest assured they want her republican opponent to be Jeb Bush instead of Donald Trump. That way they can conveniently begin using the Bush Derangement Syndrome strategy that was implemented in 2001 against George W. Bush after he won the White House.  Only this time the strategy will be used by the Liar Czar Media to help Hillary by demonizing and destroying  Jeb before he even has a chance to step into the Oval Office.

Telling a Lie Long Enough and Loud Enough…..

Remember the old adage that if you tell a lie long enough, and loud enough people will believe it is true? That’s what our main stream media outlets sells us everyday to shape their socialist narrative. This technique was on display Friday night on a seldom watched cable news show in which an old, blubbering idiot continued the far left narrative that there were never any weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq.

This is a bold face lie many on the left continue to facilitate to discredit the war in Iraq. In reality there were plenty of weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq and there are numerous print stories that belie the leftist false narrative. In 2006 Fox News reported that WMD’s were found in the country. In that same year a report from had another story that WMD’s were found on the battlefield in Iraq. Later in 2008 other news stories were reporting that WMD’s were found in Iraq according to the New York Times and NBC News. In 2010 as reported by documents revealed WMD’s were found inside Iraq. Another report in 2014 disclosed that large quantities of weapons of mass destruction were quietly removed by the pentagon so that Obama’s Syrian Rebels could not get their hands on them. With all of this information out for the world to see we still have leftist propagandists in the media still fantasizing that weapons were never found in Iraq.

Unlike Obama’s unauthorized and illegal war in Libya, George Bush asked and received congressional approval twice for the use of force in Iraq. Without the approval of democrats in congress the war in Iraq would never have taken place. Ironically, one of the politicians who voted for the war in Iraq is a well respected person of high esteem who just so happens to be the political darling of the socialist-democrat party. She is their presumed presidential nominee and her name is Hillary Rodham Clinton. Even Mrs. Clinton would go on to say in 2003 that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

It’s interesting to note that Hillary Clinton never really receives any of the type of scrutiny from the liar czar press for her role in starting an unjust war in a country that we are constantly reminded never had any weapons of mass destruction. Therefore,  you would think that the press would have vilified and treated her as someone who is certainly by no means qualified to serve as president of the United States. The socialist left and their media conveniently forget that Hillary was implicit in starting the 2003 war in Iraq. That’s why you can never forget the the old adage that, “if you tell a lie long enough, and loud enough people will believe it is true.”

Describing an Unpatriotic Hypocrite!

imagePresident Obama severely criticized president Bush back in 2008 for adding 4 trillion dollars to the nation’s debt. He would also say that doing so was, “Unpatriotic!” The one crying about the debt limit back then has more than doubled it on his watch in just six short years.

Obama was incorrect when he stated that president Bush added 4 trillion when in actuality it was 3 trillion. It is understandable why our young and inexperienced, boy leader would get his math wrong. Just look at the debt he has now accumulated since his heralded coronation back in 2008. He has added a whopping 8 trillion dollars to the national debt that today totals over 18 trillion dollars.

On the 2008 campaign trail, Obama would chastise Bush as, “unpatriotic” for piling $30,000 of debt on the backs of average Americans. Never mind that he would nearly double that to $56.000 in just 6 short years.

If George W. Bush was, “unpatriotic” for adding 3 trillion dollars to the national debt during his presidency, how would you describe someone who more than doubled that amount today?  How about an, “unpatriotic hypocrite.”

Nothing Like What George W. Bush Had To Hear…

When a republican accidentally resides in the White House it is quite ordinary and acceptable for the opposing party and their media enablers to outright lie, attack and besmirch the president of the United States. If on the other hand, should a socialist-democrat justly occupy the Oval Office any such attacks or criticism is deemed right wing hate speech and brushed off as totally unwarranted. This came to mind this week when house minority leader Nancy Pelosi implied that. “We never treated George Bush they way they treat Obama.”

Shockingly! It’s the first time I heard this blithering idiot actually say something that was factually correct. Pelosi and company did treat George W. Bush differently than Obama. They treated Bush as if he was a loathsome, hardened criminal during his presidency.

On the other hand these same moronic imbeciles embarrassingly suck up to Obama as if he is God’s gift to not only America but the rest of the good earth. Obama can do no wrong even when he is caught doing something wrong.

The media’s love affair with Obama continues even as his approval rating plunges to 38%. They simply don’t report or under-report the bad news.

As Obama ramps up another war in Iraq and Syria that may lead to a wider conflict involving Russia and Iran, remember Bush had a real coalition of 48 nations whereas Obama has none. Congress voted two different times for legislation that authorized the use of military force (AUMF) bills as it pertained to Bush. As of today Obama has no such authorization from congress and intends to use one Bush’s 2001 permission slips to legally justify his military action.

We were told by the rabid leftists and their lap dog media enablers back in 2003 that George W. Bush was a dangerous and war mongering cowboy that needed to be stopped and articles of impeachment were hastily drawn up.

Today, their pampered adolescent is in charge of building a non-existent coalition to wage an unpopular war in a far-off land. What do we hear from the far leftist crazy plebes today regarding this odd reversal of fortune? You can bet it will be nothing like what George W. Bush and the rest of us had to hear 10 years ago.

Aggressive Use of Speeches

chippy911Back in 2007 George W. Bush predicted that American forces leaving Iraq prematurely would lead that country to fall to al Qaeda or an enemy that would be just as dangerous. The president would issue that warning at a time when his poll numbers were cratering and a majority of Americans didn’t agree with the Iraq war effort. That didn’t matter to George W. Bush. All he knew was that the intelligence briefings he was receiving were indicating that if we did not do the right thing in Iraq then, we would pay a much bigger price in the future not only there but here on our homeland.

You see it wasn’t always about politics with George W. Bush. He wanted to just do the right thing. It didn’t matter what the communist/socialist left and their media chattering class wanted. They were always going to scream and yell at anything that was done by anyone named Bush because it was always political for them 24-7, 365 days a year.

Ironically, Obama would win the presidency in 2008 as the anti-war candidate beating Hillary Clinton who herself was against leaving troops in Iraq. Their reasons were pure political according to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

So if you are so inclined to watch Obama’s inane speech tonight just remember that he will not be delivering it because it is the right thing to do militarally. He will be delivering a prime time speech to save his ass politically and to improve his low approval ratings among the American people due to his lack of decision making concerning Iraq and ISIS. Obama’s intentions are to win the next election for his party in November. He doesn’t care about peace in Iraq. One thing Obama and the left never understand is that according to our enemies we live in a world that is defined by the aggressive use of force and not by the aggressive use of speeches. George W. Bush understood this. Obama doesn’t.

Lack of Funding?

chippy0523Whenever there are any “allegations of misconduct” regarding the various scandals enveloping the Obama presidency, the American people are initially told that they aren’t real scandals until the president self appoints a review board to study and examine the facts.

When the study is completed and the facts are known the American people are then told that the scandal is nothing more than a misunderstanding of the facts and that the situation will be resolved internally. Finally, with the president’s self appointed review board’s obvious conclusions, the American people are told that the misconduct that occurred was due to a “lack of funding.” They are then lectured and shamed by their president and his socialist acolytes that Americans need to pay more to correct the problem and should anyone disagree with their solution to the problem that they created; you are declared a racist, or a homophobe bigot – who just doesn’t care about people.

Take for example the Veterans Affairs scandal. Democrat minority leader Nancy Pelosi took to the microphone this week to suggest that the problems with the VA are merely George Bush’s fault. Pelosi went on to say that, “Maybe when we go to war, we should be thinking about the long term consequences and its ramifications. You would think that would be a given, but maybe it wasn’t.”  Perhaps Nancy Pelosi has forgotten the 2008 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations bill that George Bush signed into law in 2008. It was heralded as the largest increase in VA spending in 77 years. The law provided 1,000 new claims processors to reduce the backlog of 400,000 claims by mainly Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans.

You see, the Bush administration did think about the long term care of the nation’s veterans. Nancy Pelosi even voted for it. She was so excited about her vote she wanted to tell the world about it.  And she did!

For Pelosi to suggest the lack of funding for the VA was inevitably the fault of the Bush administration is disgraceful. Another false narrative about the VA shortfalls is that Bush’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan created more VA patients and therefore inevitably clogged up the system. On the same day Obama falsely declared, “end of the war in Iraq will increase need for resources from Veterans Affairs.”  Looking at the facts Obama and Pelosi could not be farther from the truth.

Only 4% of the VA yearly budget goes to veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Thats right 4%! The VA budget has exploded over 193% in last 13 years while at the same time the overall population of veterans has declined by 4.3 million. Obama, Pelosi and the rest of the democrat socialists lie and mislead Americans to think that not enough money is the problem at the VA. The problem at the VA isn’t the amount of money it receives, it’s about where it is being spent and who is spending it?

So don’t be fooled or surprised when the socialist democrats and their lying media shills start blaming the VA scandal on the “lack of funding” or the “Bush’s two wars” spin. Because none of that is true. What is true and the VA scandal proves it is that even with record spending budgets at the VA, which is the second largest department in Washington, big government never works. Spending more money to fix America’s problems only creates more problems for America to fix. That’s seems to be the socialist democrat agenda in a nutshell. The scandal is their agenda and its destroying America.