The Declaration Of The United Nations?

imagePresident Obama’s last desperate plea for a one world government came in an agonizing lecture today before the United Nations. It was there this American president angrily professed his desire to throw away every American’s constitutional right to pursue their own life, liberty and freedoms for the constraints of international law. What an embarrassment!

Obama would also say that these, “ideas are what the United Nations was built on.” He would be correct on this point. Plans for the development of the United Nations were crafted from the State Department in 1939 by Alger Hiss and Harry Hopkins. It would be revealed later that both Hiss and Hopkins were secret spies for the Soviet Union. They were more interested in promoting the collectivist idea of a “Declaration of United Nations” rather than the freedom America promised with the “United States Declaration of Independence.”

The communist hope for the UN was to make it a collectivist power structure that enables them more power and influence over other governments. The whole idea behind this concept was to keep the power of the United States in check using international law. This is what the current president of the United States wishes for us today after eight years as president of the freest country on earth. President Obama does not believe in the freedoms that are provided to every American by the constitution of the United States. He believes we need to castaway those freedoms and be legally bound by the tyranny of international law. Harry Hopkins, Alger Hiss and now Barack Obama. How sad is that?

Getting Booed Off The Stage?

imageThankfully, the republican convention finally came to a close last night. Many of the speeches given there sounded a lot like a speech you would here at the democrat convention. You could barely tell the difference between the two. At this week’s republican convention the only person talking about conservative principles was Ted Cruz. His speech highlighted  the once held importance of conservative principles such as freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. For his effort he  got booed off the stage.

There was much to do about Melania Trump’s speech. She was caught plaguerizing  a 2008 speech given by the democrat wife of Barack Obama. Melania’s speech highlighted democrat talking points that portrayed women as victims. Again, these are issues that democrats use at their convention to portray women as victims. Last night, Ivanka Trump used her speech to portray women as victims much like what you would hear at a democrat convention. In fact,  her speech used the same talking points Hillary Clinton uses in her stump speech on the campaign trail. Does this woman sound like a republican to you?

In this day and age you can’t tell the difference between the two political parties anymore. That’s because there are practically no recognizable differences between the two parties. The two political parties have dangerously become the same big government, collectivist entities that want to grow government larger and larger. Donald Trump’s main theme in his speech was that he alone will make government “smarter.” That happens to be eerily similar to another theme (smart power) that Hillary Clinton has used in the past to describe her perceived brilliance when dealing with her foreign policy decisions.

So what is the difference between the two parties? Why all the fighting and bickering between the two when they are basically promoting the same thing? Why waste time, energy and money on two conventions that basically have the same message? It is actually quite sad to learn that in today’s political world there are no significant differences between the two parties. They don’t stand for the principles and beliefs that founded our once great country. They no longer stand for  freedom, liberty and constitutionality anymore. We always knew the democrat party moored away from those values years ago. Sadly, this week we found out that the Republican Party has done the same thing. We found out this week if someone did stand for up those values, you would get booed off the stage.

A British Tea Party!

imageGet out the tea cups! A Tea Party has broken out all across Great Britain. The British people have finally voted for their own freedom. Happy days are there again. Last night the British people voted to free themselves from the big government monstrosity of the European Union. After four decades of taking orders from unelected, foreign Eurocrats in Belgium on important issues pertaining to immigration and border control, the Brits have finally had enough and voted for their own sovereignty.

The important issues that are on the minds of voters across the pond are the same ones on the minds of most Americans. They include dissatisfaction with an expensive, ineffective big government apparatus that has proven to be a colossal failure. Government inability to defend and protect their own borders. The EU had established guidelines that prohibited Britain from enforcing their own border security. This became a problem for Great Britain when millions of Muslim migrants were allowed to flood the border creating a humanitarian crisis that would prove to be both costly and deadly.

With Britain leaving the European Union, look for the other countries such as France, Italy and the Netherlands to disavow their membership in the days and weeks to come. Scotland will be voting next week on a referendum to stay or go. All of this proves once again the idea of collectivism is a hopeless failure. Collectivism stifles people’s individuality and a nation’s nationality. This morning, Great Britain has finally woken up from their collectivist nightmare and taken off the shackles placed on them by the European Union. A gigantic Tea Party has broken out all across Great Britain. For them, June 23rd will forever be remembered as Independence Day. Smashing!

Aligning with Communist Dictators

President Kennedy warned the world about the danger of communism in 1962 when he said,”Castro and his fellow dictators may rule nations, but they cannot rule people” Kennedy would be referring to the repressive rule of communism by the Fidel Castro regime 53 years ago. The United States would put sanctions in place to keep Cuba from acquiring Soviet missiles that posed a dangerous threat to our homeland.

Today, our dangerously naive president does not only disagree with the most heralded democrat president of our time concerning the communist island 90 miles to our south, he wants to altogether dismiss the potential threat that the communist country’s totalitarian ideology poses to the rest of the free world.

I guess we need to forget about the human rights abuses imposed by Cuba on its own people or their illegal missile shipments made to their communist ally, North Korea? How about their current associations with state run terrorism or their harboring of American cop killing murderers who have escaped the American justice system. All we heard last week was how rotten and inhumane America was for using enhance interrogation techniques on 3 terrorists that murdered 3,000 people. Now, we are to become friendly with a communist country that tortures and brutalizes its own citizens?

Obama and his party have more in common with this repressive, Stalinist ideology of Fidel Castro than they do with their own freedom loving country. The comparison to Cuba can be seen when it comes to their idea of redistribution of wealth, government run healthcare and greater government sanctions and regulations on private business that undermines American economic freedom. Sadly what seems to be, “foreign” to Obama and his leftist party are the ideals that created our country.

The president and his far-left, socialist party are so far-left these days that when they look down to see their toes they are actually staring at their ass! President John Fitzgerald Kennedy believed in the traditional ideals of America. His ideology was so diametrically opposite from the party of today. Kennedy was an anti-communist and was best friends with another anti-communist senator Joe McCarthy. He pushed for across the board tax cuts and a strong military. These are all things that the far-left despises and opposes today.

It is apparent that the democrats have forsaken the American ideals of John F. Kennedy and have aligned themselves with communist dictators who don’t believe individuals should have the power to behold their own liberty and freedom. They both want that power taken away from the individual and given back to the state so that the state can decide to redistribute to whomever they wish. They believe that the state shall have the ultimate power over the individual for the common good. These aren’t the values and ideals of JFK or America. They are the planks of a communist state.

A Strong Partner?

In May of 2011 president Obama spoke confidently to the nation from the Oval Office and declared an end of our combat mission in Iraq. Operation Iraqi Freedom would be over. In that speech Obama would not disclose his failure to broker a “status of forces agreement” between the U.S. and the Iraqi government that would have kept a small number of coalition forces in country to help train Iraqi forces and help keep the peace. In his speech Obama would boastfully say, “this milestone should serve as a message to the world that America intends to sustain and strengthen its leadership in this young century.”  Obama defined his speech as a “historic moment.” He ended by saying that, “there will be no doubt that the Iraqi people will have a strong partner in the United States”.

With coalition troops absent from the country for almost three years, we find al Qaeda is now flying their black flags over towns that the U.S. Armed forces once captured using the blood of American soldiers.  Mass killings and beheadings are on the rise in cities such as Fallujah,, Mosul, and now Tikrit . Many towns and cities continue to fall to dangerous Muslim fanatics who are on a rampage and many foreign policy experts now believe that terrorist extremists will ultimately lead to the fall of Baghdad. The American Embassy is being evacuated  and the Iraqi government is so desperate for help they have pleaded for the United States to engage in air support. Their requests have been denied by the man who once promised that America was Iraqi’s strongest supporter. In a sudden reversal of fortune, the country now seems to be on the verge of total collapse. Today, as American diplomats and contractors are being airlifted out of the country in an emergency fashion  the former secretary of state and presumable 2016 democrat presidential front runner Hillary Clinton strangely remains proud of her so called accomplishments in the troubled region.

What American would believe that this would now be happening in a country that was once ruled by a dictator who used chemical weapons and terror on his own people only to be successfully taken out by American and coalition forces?  In a interview from 2009 even Obama had to admit the military surge ordered by George W. Bush in Iraq worked.

In 2010 the Vice President concluded that the war in Iraq was a great success story and that all the credit should go to the Obama administration.

Is America a strong partner of Iraq as the president stated in 2011? The answer is no. It is evidently clear that Obama has run away from the victory in Iraq. In his delusional head what happens now isn’t his fault. After all, Obama is never held accountable for anything that goes wrong. He can say Bush started the war and he ended it. The victory that took place before he ended it doesn’t matter. The democrat socialists/communists who run the democrat party in America are anti-victory and anti-freedom. A victory for Iraq would mean a victory for America and they can’t afford to be associated with any of that. They snatched defeat away from victory for a people who once lived under the iron fist of an evil totalitarian dictator. The democrats finally succeeded in destroying the one chance the Iraqi people had for freedom and stability. With freedom for the Iraqi people all but lost, Obama and the American left can now spend more of its valuable time here at home destroying our own freedoms and traditions that a majority of Americans have grown to love.

Who are the “Real Terrorists?”

chippy422When I look back a year ago to the horrific terrorist bombings that took place along the finish line at the Boston Marathon that killed three people and maimed hundreds more,  I can remember media outlets eagerly hoping to pin the massacre on right-wing extremists. This was reported to America before and after anyone in the Obama liar czar media had any facts. CNN jumped to that conclusion.

 

 

 


Even NPR got into that analogy without any evidence.

After the Tsarnaev brothers became the lead suspects, MSNBC was still identifying the Tsarnaev brothers as right-wing extremists.

Chris Mathews had to weigh in and report, with no evidence, that the bombings were probably carried out by “far-right extremists.”

And, who can’t forget what liberal God Michael Moore tweeted on the day of the bombing.

It’s hard to believe that today the actual terrorist in custody in Boston gets more fawning press coverage  and adorning magazine covers than one individual rancher in Nevada who has not killed or injured anybody.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fANM3hs0Q6Q&feature=youtube_gdata_player

He is merely concerned about his private property rights and the liberty and freedom that is bestowed upon him because he is simply an American citizen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LDqif8PRuU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Note that the commentators attacking Bundy and his supporters work for MSNBC. They are propaganda dupes of the leftist media conglomerate called Comcast. By watching the media these days it’s hard to figure out who are the real terrorists?

Let’s look at some of the facts.

Tamerian Tsarnaev along with his brother Dzhokhar constructed and placed two pressure cooker bombs that were to be detonated purposely along the marathon route where innocent American citizens would be spectating. FBI interviews suggest the brothers did it in the name of Islam and the Russian government warned American officials of their concern.

On the other hand, Cliven Bundy the Nevada rancher is sticking up for his state property rights and sticking it too an out-of-control federal government agency called the Bureau of Land Management. The BLM officials set up armed officers and snipers along the ranch and used a stun gun on one of his sons. They even shot up his herd from helicopters and placed the dead cattle in mass graves. The only people looking and reacting like terrorists are the swat teams from the Bureau of Land Management, an agency of the Federal Government.

The Tsarnaev brothers and Cliven Bundy don’t get the same media treatment. It doesn’t make sense until you understand why. It is the liberal mindset. To the left,  Tamerian Tsarnaev is a poor, young immigrant from a far off land (Chechnya) who happened to make his way with his hard luck family to America. To the left, America is a country that was founded by “old white rich people”  who were inherently racist. Thus, the Tsarnaev brothers were victims of a perceived unfair and rigged-system. On the other hand, using the same leftist drivel.  Cliven Bundy iis an “old white rich guy” who happens to own too many acres of land that he really doesn’t need. In their eyes, they see this as an unfair situation and having the federal government intervene is righteous and nobel. On top of everything else, Cliven Bundy wears a cowboy hat and rides a horse to boot. That represents old, out-dated western ideals such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.. Lefty wackos can’t stand this crap! Drives them up the wall!

To liberals, Clive Bundy is not complying to them. His beliefs and ideals are out-dated and foreign to them compared to today’s moral collectivism that is being shoved down the throats of all Americans by the socialist left and their sock puppets in the media. The Tsarnaev brothers plotted and succeeded in killing and maiming hundreds of innocent people and they are the victims?  Yes, because they had a reason to “hate America.” Cliven Bundy on the other hand is assailed as a dangerous terrorist without even actually killing anyone.  Why? Because what Bundy believes in is diametrically the opposite of what the socialist left believes in. This is why Cliven Bundy and anyone else who agrees with him are the real terrorists. They are the threat and must be stopped.

World Yearns For Freedom, Embraces Tea Party

Tea1It is becoming increasingly apparent that not only in the United States, Ukraine, Venezuela and other old socialist-marxist nations, the people are beginning to embrace more Tea party, conservative type freedom movements. More people are realizing around the world that they want freedom not tyranny. We learn this today in France.

Hey Pelosi, embrace the freedom, not “The Suck!”