Getting, “Grubered!”

gruberPresident Obama threw his good buddy Jonathan Gruber, “under the bus” this weekend and said that his healthcare bill was, “debated for over a year.” The president claimed Jonathan Gruber was never in his cabinet even though he was paid well over a million dollars to be his healthcare adviser. The president and his political allies continue to distance themselves from the incriminating statements made by Gruber. While at the same time, they continue to support Obamacare even after Gruber willfully admitted that Obamacare was sold to the American people as a lie.

The president’s government takeover of the nation’s healthcare sector was never debated because the bill was never read. It was crafted by the socialist liberals in secret behind closed doors without the input of republicans. Today, polling by Gallup shows approval of Obamacare is at 37%. An all time low.

Back in 2006, Obama was developing and selling his healthcare plan during his presidential run. He touted Gruber and extolled his good friend’s knowledge and healthcare wizardry. His ideas were endorsed by Obama.

The House speaker at the time of the bill’s passage was Nancy Nancy Pelosi who now says she doesn’t even know Jonathan Gruber.

Back in 2009 Nancy Pelosi, like Obama extolled Jonathan Gruber’s brilliance on the matter of Obamacare. Back then she wanted every American to idolize Jonny G.

In 2009 the democrat majority leader in control of the Senate quoted Jonathan Gruber from a cheerleading article from the uber left-sing newspaper called the Washington Post. The leader would falsely promise that with the passage Obamacare, premiums would go down 60 percent.

Democrats can’t run away fast enough from their association to Jonathan Gruber. Americans are finally waking up to the cold reality that Obama and his party have been lying to then regarding the passage of Obamacare. Ironically, it turned out they aren’t as “stupid” as Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber has insinuated. Why? Because most Americans are finally waking up to the fact that they were lied too. In other words, they are also beginning to come to grip with the realization that they have been,”Grubered” by Obama and his devious administration.

Rejecting Socialism, 68 Years Later

rejectIt turns out Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton are not the rising political rock stars after all. After yesterdays election results, it is now quite apparent that both have become huge liabilities to not only their brand, but their party. The evidence of this reality was the shellacking the far-left took in the 2014 midterms. Virtually every democrat running in this election cycle wanted no help from the president. He was a liability to their campaigns. Obama was treated by democrat candidates as if he had Ebola. The president was so toxic that some of these candidates would refuse to even admit whether they voted for him.

This election was a referendum on Obama and his socialist, big government policies. The president would even admit to that fact.

When the president’s low popularity began sinking his party’s dim election chances whom would the democrat party ultimately look too for help? They would look to their 2016 presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton as their savior. After all, they presume she is unbeatable. It was believed by many on the far-left that Hillary is the rock star that would ultimately save the sinking ship. It was Hillary who was urgently dispatched to appear at campaign events and endorse socialist loving, far-left candidates. She was supposed to save the day for their party with her brilliant reputation and exemplary oratorical skills.

Half of the candidates Hillary Clinton endorsed lost. Sarah Palin has a higher winning percentage picking candidates. Obama, Hillary and anyone that agrees with their socialist agenda were dealt an historic body blow by a disapproving American electorate not seen since 1946. Back then the country became tired and weary of the failed socialist agenda of the Roosevelt administration. Today, in 2014 and 68 years later the American people have once again voted to reject the failed socialist policies championed by Obama, Hillary and the far-left. For Hillary Clinton, her message may be one that the American people never forget when the presidential election cycle begins in 2016. Socialism was rejected in 1946 and again in 2014. Why would anyone assume it would be popular in 2016?

Nothing Like What George W. Bush Had To Hear…

When a republican accidentally resides in the White House it is quite ordinary and acceptable for the opposing party and their media enablers to outright lie, attack and besmirch the president of the United States. If on the other hand, should a socialist-democrat justly occupy the Oval Office any such attacks or criticism is deemed right wing hate speech and brushed off as totally unwarranted. This came to mind this week when house minority leader Nancy Pelosi implied that. “We never treated George Bush they way they treat Obama.”

Shockingly! It’s the first time I heard this blithering idiot actually say something that was factually correct. Pelosi and company did treat George W. Bush differently than Obama. They treated Bush as if he was a loathsome, hardened criminal during his presidency.

On the other hand these same moronic imbeciles embarrassingly suck up to Obama as if he is God’s gift to not only America but the rest of the good earth. Obama can do no wrong even when he is caught doing something wrong.

The media’s love affair with Obama continues even as his approval rating plunges to 38%. They simply don’t report or under-report the bad news.

As Obama ramps up another war in Iraq and Syria that may lead to a wider conflict involving Russia and Iran, remember Bush had a real coalition of 48 nations whereas Obama has none. Congress voted two different times for legislation that authorized the use of military force (AUMF) bills as it pertained to Bush. As of today Obama has no such authorization from congress and intends to use one Bush’s 2001 permission slips to legally justify his military action.

We were told by the rabid leftists and their lap dog media enablers back in 2003 that George W. Bush was a dangerous and war mongering cowboy that needed to be stopped and articles of impeachment were hastily drawn up.

Today, their pampered adolescent is in charge of building a non-existent coalition to wage an unpopular war in a far-off land. What do we hear from the far leftist crazy plebes today regarding this odd reversal of fortune? You can bet it will be nothing like what George W. Bush and the rest of us had to hear 10 years ago.

Aggressive Use of Speeches

chippy911Back in 2007 George W. Bush predicted that American forces leaving Iraq prematurely would lead that country to fall to al Qaeda or an enemy that would be just as dangerous. The president would issue that warning at a time when his poll numbers were cratering and a majority of Americans didn’t agree with the Iraq war effort. That didn’t matter to George W. Bush. All he knew was that the intelligence briefings he was receiving were indicating that if we did not do the right thing in Iraq then, we would pay a much bigger price in the future not only there but here on our homeland.

You see it wasn’t always about politics with George W. Bush. He wanted to just do the right thing. It didn’t matter what the communist/socialist left and their media chattering class wanted. They were always going to scream and yell at anything that was done by anyone named Bush because it was always political for them 24-7, 365 days a year.

Ironically, Obama would win the presidency in 2008 as the anti-war candidate beating Hillary Clinton who herself was against leaving troops in Iraq. Their reasons were pure political according to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

So if you are so inclined to watch Obama’s inane speech tonight just remember that he will not be delivering it because it is the right thing to do militarally. He will be delivering a prime time speech to save his ass politically and to improve his low approval ratings among the American people due to his lack of decision making concerning Iraq and ISIS. Obama’s intentions are to win the next election for his party in November. He doesn’t care about peace in Iraq. One thing Obama and the left never understand is that according to our enemies we live in a world that is defined by the aggressive use of force and not by the aggressive use of speeches. George W. Bush understood this. Obama doesn’t.

Acting Presidential

A Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777-200 jet was blown out of the sky today over Ukraine killing all 298 people on board. It is believed that as many as 23 Americans were on board. Flight #MH-17 from Amsterdam to Kuala-Lumpur crashed near Grabovo Village after a surface to air missile provided by Vladimir Putin’s government hit the airplane in mid- air. It is believed that a Pro Russian Group is responsible for the attack.

Upon hearing the news and after speaking to Vladimir Putin on the phone president Obama gave a short one minute speech in between fundraisers in which the president seemed uncaring, detached and emotionally absent from the horrific tragedy befallen by so many loved ones here and abroad. Obama acts like this sort of thing happens everyday. At the end of the speech he is seen giving shout outs to some of his buddies.

This is how the leader of the free world conducts himself? This is what we get? Perhaps Mr. Obama should take some lessons from a real American president. One who understands the gravity of the situation and has the seriousness to explain to the nation that when planes are intentional blown up over the sky by any nation, that there will be grave and dire repercussions against that nation. We did hear a speech of that nature from a president once in 1983.

His name was Ronald Reagan and he knew how to be presidential when the situation was needed. He understood that when Americans were needlessly murdered by an evil enemy, there would be hell to pay!  Reagan knew how to act presidential because he was an adult. Obama on the other hand acts like someone who has always lived in a liberal fantasy land where reality never exists. Unbeknownst to Obama, the only thing that exists is a false notion of self contentment within the White House and that presents an overall danger to all Americans here at home and abroad.

The Appearance of “Conflict of Interest”

chippy0508_2When Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State for Barack Hussain Obama, she and her husband were receiving donations to the  William J. Clinton Foundation from the nation of Saudi Arabia and from various individuals belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood equaling well over 30 million dollars. We were assured by Hillary in 2008 there would be no appearance of “conflict of interest”. Other countries donating to their foundation were, Nigeria, Qatar, Kuwait, and Abu Dhabi of the United Arab Emirates. It just so happens that these were the same countries that supported the election of  Mohamed Morsi in Egypt.

You may recall that we had to quickly overthrow Hosni Mubarak in 2011.  We were told that he wasn’t our friend anymore and he apparently became the biggest threat to not only Egypt, but to the entire middle east. In order to calm the Arab Spring tensions and create peace who did Hillary and Obama promote to succeed ousted Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak? Mohamed Morsi, leader of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.. The Brotherhood is a hard line islamic group associated with al Qaeda and other islamic extremist groups, The Muslim Brotherhood’s motto is, “Allah is our objective, the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader, jihad is our way,and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

In 2012 Bill Clinton hosted and praised his new buddy and current Egyptian leader  Mohamed Morsi at a major gala for his Clinton Global Initiative in New York.    This was before Morsi’s was thrown out of office by the Egyptians. The  Clinton gala would feature titans of business and heads-of-state from countries all across the world. Many in the audience would be donating generously to the foundation.

Interestingly, there are other individuals who have donated money to the Clinton Foundation and have been connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. Abdulrahman Alamoudi was one member who associated with the Clintons since the 1990’s. He was a liaison for them in Islamic circles and was Head of the Muslim American Council, an offshoot of the Brotherhood. He was eventually jailed for an assassination scheme in 2004.His brother is Sheik Mohammad H. Al-Alamoudi. According to the numbers in the New York Times article, has donated five million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

Another shady individual named Gehad el-Haddad  worked for the Clinton Foundation and The Muslim Brotherhood at the same time in 2011. He is currently in jail in Egypt for being a “seditious Islamic militant” seeking to incite violence. His father worked with Morsi and was a Muslim Brotherhood Guidance Office member. It is unclear if the donors of the Clinton Foundation knew their donations were going to support terrorist groups. I wonder if the Clintons knew? I wonder if they understand just what is the Muslim Brotherhood? Why not ask Huma?

As Secretary of State, Hillary couldn’t recognize a terrorist organization if you pointed it out to her. Back in 2011 she was warned about Boko Haram, an al Qaeda offshoot, and failed to recognize them as such. Because of her failure to act then, we now have a dangerous hostage situation happening in Nigeria.

All the Clinton’s seek is money and power. On their way to that goal they failed to understand the danger in supporting organizations like The Muslim Brotherhood and the hard line Islamic nations that adhere to its radical ideology. I would hope that the William J. Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative are legally above board in all of its business practices. To have the Clintons promote and advocate an islamic extremist point of view around the world is dangerous and harmful to free people everywhere.  In the end, politically speaking it is blatantly obvious that Bill and Hillary Clinton have had an appearance of “conflict of interest” between the agenda of their foundations and the collaboration of her work as Secretary of State. They have enriched themselves greatly while partnering and partying  up with dangerous and nefarious entities. And in doing that, they have created a far more dangerous world in which we live in today.

The Truth Behind Bundy-Gate

photo (2)Isn’t it ironic that in times of political and economic trouble overseas with regards to failed diplomatic policies by the Obama administration in foreign hotspots such as EgyptLibya, SyriaIran,  Venezuela and Ukraine; our president, Barack Obama and his Attorney General Eric Holder, who are both in deep political trouble themselves…

turn their attention to a lone Nevada rancher.

His name is Cliven Bundy who is 67 years old, white and loves his country and the freedom it provides. The problem they have with Mr. Bundy  is that some of his cows have been grazing on public land. A practice that has been going on for several decades.

Why all the fuss about a few cows now?  It has come to light that the Bureau of Land Management, the federal agency fighting with Mr. Bundy, is run by an old adviser to Senator Harry Reid. You see Harry and his son Rory represent a Chinese solar company called ENN Energy Group. ENN and the Reid family want to build a 5 billion dollar solar farm on the outskirts of Mr.Bundy’s ranch.  It’s all part of a BLM project for a 7 state plan in the southwest to turn public lands into solar farms involving Chinese companies.

It seems to me that Reid and his son could reap millions in fees from this Chinese solar energy deal.  This deal needs to be investigated by the proper authorities. It seems to be getting rammed down the throats of concerned citizens who live in the area.


Instead of investigating this questionable deal, what does the federal government do? They send the full arsenal and force of federal law enforcement to stake out and harass Mr. Bundy’s family and friends.   Why? To instill fear in Mr. Bundy and also to let every American know that the Federal Government has the absolute power and ultimate control over it’s land and its citizens. All for big campaign money and another failed green energy company. Hello Solyndra!

All this harassment, upheaval and turmoil for an energy source that creates 0.1% of the electricity generated in the US?

It’s a quid pro quo deal between Obama’ s socialist friends in congress who vote for “green energy projects” and in return receive campaign cash from Chinese corporations in Beijing. Even Hillary Clinton is getting into this scam.

Boy do I smell a rat. Because this whole “green energy” bullshit brought to us by the communist left stinks to high heaven. It doesn’t produce any real usable energy. It only produces campaign cash for socialist/marxist democrats in Washington DC.