We are approaching the first 100 days of the anti-Trump media’s failed attempt to paint the president and his agenda as a complete failure. They have tried for three months now to damage the president’s bond with his supporters by trying to define him as an unelected Russian infiltrator, an unhinged egomaniac or a first class fool who is incapable of dealing with the ins and outs of Washington, D.C. With this in mind, we need to ask the question. Has the liar czar media been successful in breakingthebond between the president and his supporters?
Recent polling suggests they haven’t. The data suggests the president’s bond with his supporters is still as strong as ever. According to a new poll by the Washington Post, 96 percent of Trump voters would vote for him all over again. That’s right. The daily media spinning and whining has not hurt the president at all. In another poll by Rasmussen, the president’s approval rating is now climbing over 50 percent. Again, the negative press coverage does’nt seem to be too successful in hurting the president’s relationship with his voters.
What must be really devastating to the liar czar media and their failed presidential candidate is that even today their continuous negativity towards president Trump hasn’t done a damn thing. Thepolls show that president Trump still beats Hillary Clinton handily in a electoral and popular vote by a 43 to 40 percent margin. This further illustrates the failure the press has had in damaging the president of the United States. For three months the press has tried to define the president’s first 100 days as a complete failure. The bottom line is the real failure in Trump’s first 100 days is the media. They ultimately failed in their attempt in breakingthebond between the president and his supporters.
United Airlines is the third most powerful airline in the entire world. They are famous for using the popular 1925 George Gershwin “Rhapsody In Blue” masterpeice in one of the most successful marketing campaigns of all time called, “flythefriendlyskies.” They have used the same marketing slogan today as they did forty years ago. However, does this friendly marketing slogan still apply today after what happened to a passenger on a United flight Sunday night at O’hare International Airport?
Because of overbooking, a passenger aboard a flight bound for Louisville, Kentucky was forcefully dragged off a United Airlines flight at O’hare airport in Chicago, Illinois. The third most powerful airline company in the world that runs a successful advertising campaign slogan, “fly the friendly skies” is now forcefully dragging American customers off their airplanes with no questions asked. Is this America or a third world socialist dictatorship?
For Americans that need to fly these days they first must spend multiple hours standing in a TSA line only to get sexually groped by armed security officers in order to pass a security check point. We do all this just to earn the opportunity to sit in a expensive seat on an overly booked airline flight?
After all the airport hassle one has to go through, we used to feel safe when we finally made it aboard our United Airlines flight. Not anymore. There is nothing friendly about a airline company that routinly overbooks flights that causes the violent removal of a paying customer. It’s wrong and bad for business. United Airlines should be ashamed of their behavior. When you want your customers to, “flythefriendlyskies.” Then act like it.
Fake news outlet CNN tried its best to manufacture more propaganda yesterday when they set-up an interview using the same liberal narrative their failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton used. “If the president cares so much about the children in Syria, why doesn’t he allow them into our country?” Ironically, the answer from their guest was simply, “Wedon’twanttoberefugees!”
The interview failed miserably. They didn’t expect the interviewee to be so grateful for the United States and president Trump for the successful bombing raid. Unlike the last president who dithered on anything and everything that involved the military, the current president came to the Syrian people’s defense. Most Syrians don’t want to be sent away from their home country to be refugees in a far away land.
In one unexpected segment on CNN yesterday. A Syrian national named Kassem Eid dismantled not only the liar czar media’s fake narrative travel ban, but Hillary Clinton’s narrative that Syrian refugees are desperately praying to be sent to the United States. When CNN asked if Syrians are longing to flee their own country for America, a Syrian national named Kassem Eid honestly said what most Syrians believe. “Wedon’twanttoberefugees!”
It’s always amusing to watch a liberal suddenly become surprised to learn thier own liberalism is nothing more than a boneheadedpoliticalideology. This was on display today on CNN when host David Gregory asked the number one question pertaining to the chemical weapons attack on a hospital in Syria. “Why were they (chemical weapons) still there?” We were promised by the Obama administration that Syria was chemical weapons free.
Perhaps the best people to answer David Gregory’s question would be Barack Obama, John Kerry and Susan Rice. It was those three who proudly proclaimed to the free world that Syria was now free of chemical weapons.
This only proves that liberalism is nothing more than a political philosophy devoid of all facts and reality. Those that believe in such lunacy have once again proven to all that they are inherently dangerous and inept at running anything meaningful much less the federal government.
Why did innocent people have to die in Syria from chemical weapons when they were promised by the Obama administration they didn’t exist? We can thank CNN and David Gregory for giving us some clues. We can now surmise those people were not only murdered by lethal chemical weapons, but by the boneheadedpoliticalideology of the Obama administration.
Lying comes naturally for people in the press. That’s why they are there in the first place. To protect fellow left-wingers at all costs. Thetruthbedamned. This is what NBC employs Chris Mathews to do on a daily basis. For example, back in early 2014 Mathews was a guest on NBC’s “Meet The Press” to prop up the presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton. He did so by defending her decision to blame an internet video for the murder of four Americans in Benghazi in 2012. In the clip below Mathews defends not only Hillary Clinton, but Susan Rice. She was the person who was sent out to lie for the Obama administration about the Internet video.
At the time it was quite obvious to many who can think for themselves that the Internet video explanation was a complete fabrication made up to protect the president’s chances of getting reelected two months later. Any known terrorist attack would simply be kept quietly by the liar czar media in order to get their dear leader reelected. Their plan on that ultimately succeeded.
However, they couldn’t conceal the actual truth behind the attack in Benghazi. Through a freedom of information act we would soon find out the administration’s internet video defense was indeed a bold face lie. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Susan Rice and others in the Obama government knew immediately that what caused the deaths of four Americans was not done by a video, but by a calculated terrorist attack.
When breaking news came out yesterday that revealed Susan Rice as a key figure in the illegal unmasking of intelligence information on Trump administration officials, Chris Mathews was the first person to cast aspersions on the claims and blame the accusations on right wing republicans who were only out to politically damage Mrs. Rice because she happens to be a woman of color. When the left is devoid of the facts, all they have left to throw around are the same old charges of racism and bigotry.
Susan a Rice has a long history of lying for the Obama administration. In fact, she is so skillful at her craft she was promoted instead of demoted. Liar Czar media members also have a long history of doing the same thing regardless of the authenticity of the facts. To them, their socialist ideology must always be protected. The same goes for those who are employed to sell it. The leftist ideology and the people who are paid to promote it must always be protected at all costs. Thetruthbedamned.