The Benghazi Lie Heard Around The World

chippy0429As the nation’s attention continues to be diverted by the Obama propaganda news outlets with their stories that fit their socialist narrative on racism, poverty and income inequality, the real news about the Obama administration is starting to see the light of day. New emails provided by Judicial Watch reveal that Obama senior adviser Ben Rhodes was the person who gave advice to Susan Rice, then Ambassador of the UN, for her appearances on the Sunday news shows.

The advice was, “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.” and “to reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”  The Rhodes email was sent to over 100 people in the White House inner circle.

Rhodes emails, dated 9/14/12, also stated this about the internet video, “We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is no justification  at all for responding to this movie with violence.”

You may recall Hillary Clinton, alongside Obama, using just that phrase the very day that email was sent out on September 14, 2012. They started the lie that would eventually travel around the world in front of the victims and their mourning families.

Susan Rice used the same lie when she appeared on all of the Sunday news shows.

She said the above to Candy Crowley who should have known that CNN’s own website
days earlier had correctly confirmed that the attack was done by Al Qaeda and was in retribution for the drone attack that killed the #2 man behind Ayman al-Zawahiri.

You can’t let the truth or the facts get in the way of getting Obama re-elected. Candy would then willingly help Obama in a debate she was moderating/cheerleading for his re-election.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6QLfwq4q04&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Obama kept to the lying script and repeated it at the United Nations for all the world to see.

We are being lied to by Obama and everyone in his administration. We have a lazy liar czar press community that joyfully sucks this bullshit down their throats everyday.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=by-8R83Kcas&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Ben Rhodes is an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications. He works for Obama. He does what Obama tells him to do.
Ben’s brother, David Rhodes is President of CBS News. Sharyl Attkisson worked for CBS News. The same network that spiked Sharyl’s reports on Benghazi.

Buy The Ticket – Take The Ride

cambo042514It was just another manic Monday  er…Friday that is…

Ouch! Ouch! Let go of my arm!

How are our momo stocks taking us in to this weekend?  Priceline.com: -59.79 *GACK* Amazon.com-33.32 *SPLAT*   Wynn Resorts: -11.64 S%!F#K&!?  Netflix: -21.99 Oy… the humanity!  Linkden -13.46 DOH!

Meanwhile I have blithering, blabbering, talking heads on CNBC tout television; reminding me about “money on the sidelines waiting to come in”…

Ponder this – if money is on the sidelines and coming in – does then, that not mean… that other money is selling to them and coming out? Hello? SIR! Who wants to be the next bag holding retard? Or as my French Canadian future ex mother in law would say…“ray-tard”. Eh?

 

BTFD! and BTFATH! And then go read some ancient history from March 2000

Who are the Real Americans?

real_americansIt’s not surprising that today The New York Times would come out and write a snarky, ass wipe article on Cliven Bundy.  What took so long? It may be that they were too busy kissing the butt of their marxist/socialist, heart throb writer Thomas Piketty. Why would the New York Times pay attention to any real news when you can fantasize about world communism and totalitarianism? Since when did they report real news anyway? Go ask Walter Duranty?

The Times article tries to make Bundy out to be a racist when he is actually channelling a prominent best selling author Star Parker.

The article quotes Bundy as using the term Negro. When did Negro become a bad word?
“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.”

Mr. Bundy is describing the damage that government dependency can do to the American family. I would agree with Mr. Bundy that government dependency destroys a family’s  ability to nurture and grow. It only equates to more government dependency. This is exactly what Starr Parker writes about in her book. In it she writes, “government manipulates, controls, and ultimately devastates the lives of the poor.”

Mr.Bundy may have a point about people “having nothing to do.”  A new study points out that under our wonderful socialist president, the unemployment rate among black teens nationally is at a 38%. In Chicago, Obama’s old stomping ground, that rate is a staggering 92%. Congressman Emanuel Cleaver of Illinois said, “If a white man would have been president we would be marching around the White House.”

The New York Times, a liar czar propaganda outlet for Obama, also quoted Mr. Bundy as saying, ““And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”

What Mr Bundy is saying is that government dependency equates to government slavery. He is referring to the notion that you eventually become the property of the all powerful and ever growing state. He reflects on the idea that the Negro maybe better off being a slave in the old days when government wasn’t as big as it is today. I think what Cliven is suggesting here is that being a slave to big government is worse off than being a slave to a slave owner in the pre-Civil War days. That may or may not be true. But I get a sense he means that with big government and all of its growing agencies, an individual has to deal with not one, but thousands of government slave masters.

As far as what he says about the issue of abortion. He is correct. 1 in 3 women in America have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. Black teenagers were twice as likely to have an abortion than white or Latino teenagers.

The New York Times is trying to belittle and besmirch Cliven Bundy because he is the “headline” now in America.  He is exposing the shocking story of big government over-reach that affects every single American of every race. Bundy gets in the way of their communist agenda.  They don’t agree with his politics. He isn’t a communist sympathizer who admires Stalin and Lenin. Bundy is “The Man” here. He is getting in the way of the Times agenda. I would suggest that the New York Times stick to writing more whiney and useless stories about lovable little terrorists and communist/socialists ninnies and leave the real truth telling and heavy lifting to “real Americans.”

Who are the “Real Terrorists?”

chippy422When I look back a year ago to the horrific terrorist bombings that took place along the finish line at the Boston Marathon that killed three people and maimed hundreds more,  I can remember media outlets eagerly hoping to pin the massacre on right-wing extremists. This was reported to America before and after anyone in the Obama liar czar media had any facts. CNN jumped to that conclusion.

 

 

 


Even NPR got into that analogy without any evidence.

After the Tsarnaev brothers became the lead suspects, MSNBC was still identifying the Tsarnaev brothers as right-wing extremists.

Chris Mathews had to weigh in and report, with no evidence, that the bombings were probably carried out by “far-right extremists.”

And, who can’t forget what liberal God Michael Moore tweeted on the day of the bombing.

It’s hard to believe that today the actual terrorist in custody in Boston gets more fawning press coverage  and adorning magazine covers than one individual rancher in Nevada who has not killed or injured anybody.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fANM3hs0Q6Q&feature=youtube_gdata_player

He is merely concerned about his private property rights and the liberty and freedom that is bestowed upon him because he is simply an American citizen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LDqif8PRuU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Note that the commentators attacking Bundy and his supporters work for MSNBC. They are propaganda dupes of the leftist media conglomerate called Comcast. By watching the media these days it’s hard to figure out who are the real terrorists?

Let’s look at some of the facts.

Tamerian Tsarnaev along with his brother Dzhokhar constructed and placed two pressure cooker bombs that were to be detonated purposely along the marathon route where innocent American citizens would be spectating. FBI interviews suggest the brothers did it in the name of Islam and the Russian government warned American officials of their concern.

On the other hand, Cliven Bundy the Nevada rancher is sticking up for his state property rights and sticking it too an out-of-control federal government agency called the Bureau of Land Management. The BLM officials set up armed officers and snipers along the ranch and used a stun gun on one of his sons. They even shot up his herd from helicopters and placed the dead cattle in mass graves. The only people looking and reacting like terrorists are the swat teams from the Bureau of Land Management, an agency of the Federal Government.

The Tsarnaev brothers and Cliven Bundy don’t get the same media treatment. It doesn’t make sense until you understand why. It is the liberal mindset. To the left,  Tamerian Tsarnaev is a poor, young immigrant from a far off land (Chechnya) who happened to make his way with his hard luck family to America. To the left, America is a country that was founded by “old white rich people”  who were inherently racist. Thus, the Tsarnaev brothers were victims of a perceived unfair and rigged-system. On the other hand, using the same leftist drivel.  Cliven Bundy iis an “old white rich guy” who happens to own too many acres of land that he really doesn’t need. In their eyes, they see this as an unfair situation and having the federal government intervene is righteous and nobel. On top of everything else, Cliven Bundy wears a cowboy hat and rides a horse to boot. That represents old, out-dated western ideals such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.. Lefty wackos can’t stand this crap! Drives them up the wall!

To liberals, Clive Bundy is not complying to them. His beliefs and ideals are out-dated and foreign to them compared to today’s moral collectivism that is being shoved down the throats of all Americans by the socialist left and their sock puppets in the media. The Tsarnaev brothers plotted and succeeded in killing and maiming hundreds of innocent people and they are the victims?  Yes, because they had a reason to “hate America.” Cliven Bundy on the other hand is assailed as a dangerous terrorist without even actually killing anyone.  Why? Because what Bundy believes in is diametrically the opposite of what the socialist left believes in. This is why Cliven Bundy and anyone else who agrees with him are the real terrorists. They are the threat and must be stopped.

The New Rock Star of the Left and the White House

commie_cocksuckersThomas Piketty is a young economics professor from France. He is a socialist with a brand new book trumpeting more taxes and bigger government. Thus, instantly making him the new “rock star” of the left.
In his new book, “Capital, in the Twenty First Century” Piketty speaks to the idea of imposing a world tax on the rich and calling for more wealth redistribution.

He is of course a blithering fool who thinks a world  tax on the wealthy would be just the ticket. Yea! Great idea! This is why Europe needs to be bailed out!  Of course, that would never work here because our constitution would not allow it.  But who is to stop that silly little notion with president Obama in office.

Last week Piketty met with Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew. He has also admitted that the democrat party and the Obama administration have been “using his findings for a long time.”

If this is true. No wonder we are floundering as a nation economically. Mixing Free Market Capitalism with Marxism/Socialism isn’t a recipe for anything good. It’s a recipe for disaster. The two philosophies can’t work together in any shape or form. This has been proven to be true with Obamacare.

We will not survive as a free country if we keep electing these smug, college elitist punks who are now legislating this marxist bull crap in Washington DC. Unfettered markets will always work themselves out. They always do. They will not with people who believe in failed european ideologies such as Thomas Piketty, Jacob Lew and Barack Obama.

Rebranding the Maoist in the Pantsuit

hagAlmost half of the people in America can’t stand Hillary Clinton! In a new poll 45% viewed Hillary as unfavorable, while 49% viewed the walking pantsuit as favorable.

With this new reality facing team Clinton, rebranding their damaged leader couldn’t happen at a better time. Oh wait! Look who is pregnant! 

IT is quite possible and very likely that there will be more rebranding and rebuilding from this crowd along with helpful advice and imagery from their liar czar media friends over the next 2 years that some may need a secret communist/socialist decoder ring to figure it out. No worry here! We can figure it out without the decoder ring.